Legal Opinion
Stormans, Inc. v. Selecky
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 8, 2009No. 07-36039, 07-36040PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WARDLAW, Circuit Judge:
We must decide whether the district court abused its discretion by preliminarily enjoining the enforcement of new rules promulgated by the Washington State Board of Pharmacy (“Board”) that require pharmacies to deliver lawfully prescribed Federal Drug Administration (“FDA”)-approved medications and prohibit discrimination against patients, on the ground that the rules violate pharmacies’ or their licensed pharmacists’ free exercise rights under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292. Because we conclude that the…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Stormans, Inc. v. SeleckyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Mayfield v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Planetspace Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Herrejon v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2013
- Native Village of Kivalina v. ExxonMobil Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2009
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.