Legal Opinion

Brougham v. Paul

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 27, 1908No. Gen. No. 13,597PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Assumpsit. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Richard S. Tuthill, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Adams

Appellant’s counsel contend that there was an express contract between the appellee, Edgar T. Paul, and Daniel E. Murphy, deceased, and that such being the case, there can he no recovery, the suit being on an implied contract. Thomas B. Brougham, the appellant, testified that the tract of land in question (which consisted of about thirty acres situated in North Evanston, in Cook county) was purchased by Mr. Murphy for $90,000—$60,000 cash and an equity in a building situated in the city of Chicago, called the Wisconsin building, which equity was estimated to be of the value of $30,000. Mr.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Walker v. BrownIllinois Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Peaslee v. GlassIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Orr v. WardIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Davis v. Fidelity Fire InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Siegel v. BorlandIllinois Supreme Court · 1901

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Goodman v. Motor Products Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1959
  2. Velsicol Corp. v. HymanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1949
  3. Cooney v. City of BellevilleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1941
  4. Henderson v. Clark Oil & Refining Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API