Legal Opinion
Van Atta v. Kal-Aero, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided January 28, 1983No. G82-51 CA1PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION RE: MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
HILLMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff brings suit for alleged violations of her rights under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act [hereinafter the “ADEA”], 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-34, under Michigan’s Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act [the Act], M.C.L.A. §§ 37.2101-37.2804, and under Michigan common law for alleged breach of an employment contract. Jurisdiction for the federal claim is asserted under 29 U.S.C. § 626(c) and (d), and 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1343(4). Plaintiff claims that the state law claims may be heard in this court on the basis of pendent…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Moor v. County of AlamedaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Mohasco Corp. v. SilverSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Drez v. E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1987
- Bradford v. General Telephone Co. of MichiganDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1985
- Perazzo v. Top Value Enterprises, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1984
- Clark v. Burroughs Corp.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1985