Legal Opinion
Clark v. Burroughs Corp.
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Decided November 15, 1985No. LR-C-85-161PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HENRY WOODS, District Judge.
Defendant Burroughs Corporation filed a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Burroughs claims this Court does not have jurisdiction because the EEOC charge on which this age discrimination claim is based was not timely filed. The defendant further contends it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law since there is no genuine issue of material fact existing in the case.
The timeliness of an EEOC charge is governed by 29 U.S.C.A. § 626(d)(1) which provides that “[s]uch a charge shall be filed within 180 days…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mohasco Corp. v. SilverSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Oscar Mayer & Co. v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Melba OLSON, Appellant, v. REMBRANDT PRINTING CO., AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
- Arthur N. ARONSEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CROWN ZELLERBACH, a Corporation, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Loudoun Times-Mirror v. Arctic Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Pierce v. MarshDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1987