Legal Opinion
Szabo v. Smedvig Tankrederi A. S.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 6, 1951No. Civ. 61-15PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WEINFELD, District Judge.
The defendant moves to vacate and set aside service of the summons and complaint.
The action was instituted by the plaintiff who is a Hungarian national, residing within the State of New York, under the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C.A. § 688.
The defendant is a Norwegian corporation and maintains no office in the State of New York or in the United States. It is the owner of the vessel “Ole Bull” upon which plaintiff claims he sustained the injuries for which he seeks to recover damages. The vessel is registered, licensed and operated under the Norwegian flag with her home port at…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hutchinson v. Chase & Gilbert, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- Jenkins v. Lykes Bros. S. S. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1943
- Neset v. ChristensenDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1950
- Andrade v. American Mail Lines, Ltd.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1947
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Mr. And Mrs. A. T. Stanga v. McCormick Shipping CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- Grammenos v. LemosCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Gkiafis v. Steamship YiosonasCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1965
- Nectarios Koupetoris v. Konkar Intrepid Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Satterfield v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1955
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.