Legal Opinion
Satterfield v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 18, 1955PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PALMIERI, District Judge.
This is a 'motion under Rule 12(b) of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C., to dismiss the action against defendant, H. E. Millard Lime & Stone Co. (Millard) . The action is one to recover for personal injuries and federal jurisdiction is based on diversity of citizenship. 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a) (1). Millard urges that it is entitled to a dismissal on the grounds that: (1) It is not subject to service of process in this jurisdiction; (2) It is not subject to suit in this district; and (3) It has not been served with process in this action.
Millard is a corporation that…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Polizzi v. Cowles Magazines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Bomze v. Nardis Sportswear, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- Pulson v. American Rolling Mill Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1948
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Harold Noel Arrowsmith, Jr. v. United Press InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Mr. And Mrs. A. T. Stanga v. McCormick Shipping CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- Remington Rand, Inc. v. Knapp-Monarch CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
- Rayco Manufacturing Co. v. Chicopee Manufacturing Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1957
- Sweetheart Plastics, Inc. v. Illinois Tool Works, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1967
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.