Crown Center Redevelopment Corp. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JOHN W. OLIVER, Chief Judge.

I

This case presently pends on plaintiff Crown Center Redevelopment Corporation’s motion for leave to serve six more than the twenty interrogatories authorized by Local Rule 2(e).1 Defendant Westinghouse, although conceding that plaintiff’s proposed additional interrogatories are not “egregiously burdensome,” nevertheless opposes plaintiff’s motion on the ground that plaintiff has failed to show “good cause as to why it ought to be allowed to depart from the rule [Local Rule 2(e)].”

Defendant Westinghouse’s suggestions in opposition directs…