Legal Opinion
Kloidt v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided April 21, 1939PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Palmee, S. C. C.
This canse of action is submitted to the court by stipulation of certain facts, with exhibits, for the purpose of having a determination in the first instance of certain legal questions, which may make unnecessary a trial of the facts. However, the stipulation provides that in the event of the determination of the legal questions adversely to the defendant, then certain questions are to be submitted to the jury for determination as to the facts.
The stipulation is elaborate and detailed so that a recital of the facts therein set forth is unnecessary at the present time.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Boseman v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Smithart v. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1934
- Meyerson v. New Idea Hosiery Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Magee v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
- Williams v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Elfstrom v. New York Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Poch v. Equit. L. Assur. Soc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Wells v. Wilbur B. Driver Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972
- Ebert v. BalterNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
- Norby v. Bankers Life Co. of Des Moines, IowaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.