Legal Opinion

United States v. McBlaine

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 23, 1928No. 2982Published

1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge

This appeal involves 11 protests covering 33 entries of cotton rags which were classified by the collector under paragraph 1457 of the Tariff Act of 1922, as waste, at 10 per centum ad valorem. The United States Customs Court sustained the protests, holding that the goods were free of duty under paragraph 1601, as old junk, or under paragraph 1651, as rags used chiefly for paper making. The protests of the importers claimed them free of duty as rags chiefly used for paper making, under paragraph 1651, free of duty as junk, old, under paragraph 1601, or free as cotton or cotton waste under…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Harley Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  2. United States v. Rockhill & VietorCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920
  3. United States v. Wakem & McLaughlin (Inc.)Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  4. Katzenstein & Keene v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API