Legal Opinion

Katzenstein & Keene v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 22, 1926No. 2678PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge

Cotton rags imported at the port of New York were classified by the collector of customs as waste not specially provided for and assessed for duty at 10 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1457 of the Tariff Act of 1922, which paragraph reads as follows:

Pab. 1457. Waste, not specially provided for, 10 per centum ad valorem.

The importers protested that the importation was rags for making paper and therefore exempt from duty under that part of the free list which reads as follows:

FREE LIST

Sec. 201. That on and after the day following the passage of this act, * * * the articles mentioned in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. Wakem & McLaughlin (Inc.)Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. International Models, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
  2. Freedman & Slater, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
  3. Tower v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  4. United States v. McBlaineCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  5. Wilbur-Ellis Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API