United States v. Wakem & McLaughlin (Inc.)
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge
The importation was tankage from slaughterhouses of Canada and was assessed by the collector at 20 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1459 of the act of 1922 as a nonenumerated manufactured article. The importer protested the classification, claiming it to be free of duty as a substance used chiefly for fertilizer under paragraph 1583 of the same law or under paragraph 1591, 1592, 1655, 1524, or 1526, or, if dutiable, at 10 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1457 as waste.
The Board of General Appraisers, by its majority decision, sustained the protest which applied to entries under the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Magone v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Darling & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
- Farrell v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
- Shallus v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maryland · 1903
- Thurlow Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. SwiftCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
- Katzenstein & Keene v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
- International Models, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1985
- Bangor & Aroostook Railroad v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.