Legal Opinion

Brown v. Spector

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 29, 1934No. 2549PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

We are compelled by the showing made by appellees to strike appellants' briefs. In his motion to strike, appellee Brown prays that the briefs be stricken and "the cause be in all things affirmed." The motion filed by appellee J. Spector, plaintiff below, was to strike and dismiss the appeal and, in the alternative, to affirm. The motion of appellee Brown to strike the brief and affirm the judgment requires us to search the record for fundamental error; under this motion to affirm, though appellants have no briefs, the record must be searched for fundamental error. Haynes v. J. M. Radford…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Haynes v. J. F. Radford Grocery CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Rio Grande Railroad v. City of BrownsvilleTexas Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Montgomery v. GallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  4. Vaughn v. CharpiotCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  5. Yardley v. Houston Oil Co. of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Page v. HancockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
  2. Kroger Food Company v. SingletaryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
  3. Commercial Music Company v. KlagCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
  4. Reiner v. MarceauCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
  5. Federal Underwriters Exchange v. HustedCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API