Legal Opinion

Rio Grande Railroad v. City of Brownsville

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1876PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appeal from Cameron. Tried below before the Hon. W. H. Russell. The facts are fully stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Moore, Associate Justice.

The importance of the questions involved in this case would have well justified a more thorough and careful preparation of the record than it seems to have received. The judgment entry recites that the motion to dissolve the injunction was submitted to the court on affidavits, and that the case on its final hearing was decided by the court — a jury having been waived — “on the petition, answers, affidavits, and evidence offered” by the parties. Tet neither the affidavits nor the matters deposed to in them are incorporated into or made part of the statement of facts.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. The People v. . VanderbiltNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
  2. White v. FlannigainCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1852
  3. Ewell v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
  4. Dunning v. City of AuroraIllinois Supreme Court · 1866

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. In Re DebsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Haynes v. J. F. Radford Grocery CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Mayor of Houston v. Houston City Street Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1892
  4. City of Moundsville v. Ohio R. R.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Peters v. City of San AntonioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API