Legal Opinion

Jane Roes 1-2 v. SFBSC Management, LLC

District Court, N.D. California

Decided January 12, 2015No. Case No. 14-3616 (LB); ECF No. 17PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON ANONYMITY & SEALING

LAUREL BEELER, United States Magistrate Judge

INTRODUCTION

This is a dispute under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219, and various California labor laws. (Am. Compl. — ECF No. 11 at 1-2, ¶ 1.) It is a putative collective action under the FLSA and a putative class action under Rule 23. (Id. at 18-19, ¶¶ 60, 63-64.)1 The plaintiffs formerly worked for defendant SFBSC Management, LLC as “exotic dancers” — which is to say, “nude *992and semi-nude” dancers — at various nightclubs. (ECF No. 11 at 1-3, ¶¶ 1, 7.) They claim that SFBSC wrongfully ■…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Does I thru XXIII v. Advanced Textile Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. John James Mary James v. Cecil B. Jacobson, Jr., M.D. Reproductive Genetics Center, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. StoterauCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Doe v. UNUM Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2016
  2. Woods v. Club Cabaret, Inc.District Court, C.D. Illinois · 2015
  3. Publius v. Boyer-VineDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2017
  4. B.M. v. Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2020
  5. B.M. v. Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2025

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API