Legal Opinion

Doe v. UNUM Life Insurance Co. of America

District Court, N.D. California

Decided February 22, 2016No. Case No. 15-cv-05622-WHOPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS AND DENYING MOTION TO ALLOW PLAINTIFF TO PROCEED ANONYMOUSLY

Re: Dkt. Nos. 16, 19

WILLIAM H. ORRICK, United States District Judge

INTRODUCTION

Federal courts are courts of public record. Some litigants and witnesses prefer anonymity because of the unwanted attention litigation can bring. But the strong presumption is that the public has a right to know who is seeking what in court and whether he or she is entitled to the relief sought. The presumption can be overcome in unusual cases where safety is an issue or stigma is so palpable that anonymity is critical. But…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. CohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Does I thru XXIII v. Advanced Textile Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  3. John Doe v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield United of Wisconsin and Aurora Health Care, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  4. United States v. StoterauCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. Doe v. Kamehameha Schools/Bernice Pauahi Bishop EstateCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. (PC) Doe v. RosaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
  2. A.V., A Sex Trafficked Individual v. AvalonBay Communities, Inc. D/B/A Avalon at Mission Bay, et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2026
  3. Alaric-Lorenzo v. ZuchowskiDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2021
  4. B.M. v. Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2020
  5. C. R. v. Blue Shield of CaliforniaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2026

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API