Legal Opinion

B.M. v. Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided February 18, 2025No. 5:20-cv-00656Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 SAN JOSE DIVISION 5 6 J.M. as Personal Representative of the Case No. 20-cv-00656-BLF ESTATE OF B.M., 7 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S 8 MOTION TO PROCEED UNDER v. PSEUDONYM; AND VACATING 9 MOTION HEARING SET FOR WYNDHAM HOTELS & RESORTS, INC., MARCH 20, 2025 10 et al., [Re: ECF 206] 11 Defendants. 12 13 Sex trafficking victim B.M. brought this action under the Trafficking Victims Protection 14 Reauthorization Act (“TVPRA”),

18 U.S.C. § 1589

et seq., alleging that Defendant hotel chains 15 profited from sex trafficking…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Does I thru XXIII v. Advanced Textile Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  2. Jane Roes 1-2 v. SFBSC Management, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API