Legal Opinion
Penland v. BIC CORP.
District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Decided July 1, 1992No. ST-C-91-14-PPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
ROBERT D. POTTER, District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the several Motions of the Parties. On 29 January 1992, Defendants moved for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff, on 12 March 1992, moved to reinstate Plaintiffs claim in strict liability. Subsequently, on 5 March 1992, Defendants moved to strike certain affidavits and other materials filed by Plaintiff in opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. In addition, on that same date, Defendant moved to conduct limited discovery into the conduct of Counsel for Plaintiff. On 16 March 1992,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Cockerham v. WardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Commercial Data Servers, Inc. v. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATIONDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Sandra Ruffin Catherine Ruffin, by and Through Her Guardian Ad Litem, C. Timothy Williford v. Shaw Industries, Incorporated Sherwin-Williams CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
- St. Clair v. General Motors Corp.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1998