Introducing Exa PlacesLearn more
Legal Opinion

Burgess v. Arita

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided June 10, 1985No. 9655; CIVIL NO. 53441PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

TANAKA, J.

Defendants Frank Motoshi Arita and Lindsey Tamio Arita (collectively the Aritas) and Dominis Garrida Anderson (Anderson) and Jean MHlicent Anderson (collectively the Andersons) (the Aritas and the Andersons being collectively referred to as Sellers) appeal from the judgment awarding plaintiffs Rodney K. Burgess, III (Burgess) and Carole Jane Burgess (collectively Buyers) damages for the breach of the Deposit Receipt, Offer and Acceptance dated November 30, 1976 (Burgess DROA), and dismissing Sellers’ third-party complaint against George M. Hasegawa (Hasegawa).…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Cahill v. Hawaiian Paradise Park CorporationHawaii Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Ferreira v. Honolulu Star-Bulletin, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Bendix Corp. v. AdamsAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Greer v. KooikerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  5. Aboud v. AdamsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Amfac, Inc. v. Waikiki Beachcomber Investment Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Kawamata Farms, Inc. v. United Agri ProductsHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Weinberg v. MauchHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Zanakis-Pico v. Cutter Dodge, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. PineroHawaii Supreme Court · 1993

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API