Legal Opinion

Zanakis-Pico v. Cutter Dodge, Inc.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 2002No. 22987PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court By

LEVINSON, J.

The plaintiffs-appellants/eross-appellees, Mary Zanakis-Pico and Thomas M. Pico (the Picos) appeal from the amended judgment of the first circuit court, the Honorable Gary W.B. Chang presiding, filed on November 4, 1999. The Picos argue that the circuit court erred in: (1) partially granting the motion of the defendant-appellee/cross-appellant Cutter Dodge, Inc., d/b/a Cutter Dodge Chrysler Plymouth Jeep Eagle (Cutter), for partial summary judgment as to damages, based on its conclusion that the Picos were not entitled to “benefit-of-the-bargain” damages in…

2Cases cited61 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Steinberg v. Chicago Medical SchoolIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Hawaii Community Federal Credit Union v. KekaHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  4. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. FIGGIE INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  5. Ellis v. CrockettHawaii Supreme Court · 1969

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Plath v. SchonrockMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Young v. Allstate Insurance Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Kamaka v. Goodsill Anderson Quinn & StifelHawaii Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Bynum v. MagnoHawaii Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Exotics Hawaii-Kona, Inc. v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2007

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API