Legal Opinion
United States v. Thomas J. Cleary, Thomas James Cleary
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 2, 1995No. 94-3290PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ROTH, Circuit Judge:
I. INTRODUCTION
Thomas James Cleary (“Cleary”) appeals from an order of the district court entered on May 24, 1994, denying Cleary’s motion to vacate or correct an illegal sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Cleary asserts that the district court violated Rule 11(c)(1) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure by failing, at his change of plea hearing, to adequately inform him and determine that he understood the maximum penalty he could receive. In particular, Cleary contends that the court erred by failing to explain the effects of a term of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. AddonizioSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. TimmreckSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Robert Lebern Lucas, Jr., Cross-Appellee v. United States of America, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- United States v. Cyrus R. SandersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Buehl v. VaughnCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Thomas G. Parry Bh-2648 v. Frederick RosemeyerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Kevin Fowler v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Mike Mustafa A/K/A Darwish MustafaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.