Legal Opinion

Lindsey v. Smith and Johnson, Inc.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1980PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HENRY, Justice.

The basic issue in this workers’ compensation case is whether plaintiff, a carpenter by trade, was an employee of the company for which he was framing houses when he was injured. The trial judge found that plaintiff was a partner in a subcontracting partnership which was working for defendant general contractor who had reserved the right to direct and control his subcontractors. The trial judge held that the partnership, with its three employees, was not large enough to be covered by workers’ compensation insurance and, additionally, that partners were not covered by the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cromwell General Contractor, Inc. v. LytleTennessee Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Gebers v. Murfreesboro Laundry Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Barnes v. National Mortgage Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Turner v. Bluff City Lumber Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Smart v. EmbryTennessee Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Gray v. Cullom MacHine, Tool & Die, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Stratton v. United Inter-Mountain Telephone Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Masiers v. Arrow Transfer & Storage Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Watt v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Goodale v. LangenbergCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2007

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API