Legal Opinion
Werlein v. United States
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided April 21, 1992No. 3-84-996PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
UNOPPOSED MOTION TO VACATE RULING OF SEPTEMBER 4, 1990 CERTIFYING CLASS ACTION CLAIMS INVOLVING “DISTINCT AND COMPLETED PHASES”
RENNER, District Judge.
Defendant, the United States of America, in accordance with the terms of the settlement agreement and pursuant to the laws of the United States, moves that this Court vacate its ruling of September 4, 1990, 746 F.Supp. 887, certifying the class action for challenges to distinct and completed phases of the cleanup, as moot and of no continuing force or effect, and as a basis therefore states as follows:
1. Filed contemporaneously herewith is a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Deakins v. MonaghanSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Webster v. Reproductive Health ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Werlein v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1990
- South Dakota v. HazenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Sierra Club v. El Paso Gold Mines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Liberty Lincoln Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Marketing Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
- In re Rezulin Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Thompson v. American Tobacco Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1999
- Dhamer v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.