Legal Opinion

Dhamer v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided November 18, 1998No. 98 C 2243PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

HART, District Judge.

This is a putative class action brought by named plaintiff Meg Dhamer (“plaintiff’ or “Dhamer”) against defendant Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. (“defendant” or “BMS”) seeking damages and injunctive relief.1 Plaintiffs five count complaint alleges that a prescription pain relief product, Stafiol Nasal Spray (“Stadol NS”), sold by defendant was dangerous, defective, addictive and did not bear adequate warnings. Count I alleges violations of the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act, count II alleges violations of the New Jersey…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. In Re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  4. Dianne Castano v. The American Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  5. Connick v. Suzuki Motor Co., Ltd.Illinois Supreme Court · 1996

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Henry Schein, Inc. v. StromboeTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Philip Morris Inc. v. AngelettiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  3. Julie Olden, Richard Hunter, Wilbur Bleau, and All Others Similarly Situated v. Lafarge Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  4. Clay v. American Tobacco Co.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 1999
  5. In re Rezulin Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API