Midkiff v. Carter
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Appeal from Ohio Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court ey
Judge Quin
Affirming.
In June, 1913, appellee Carter and others petitioned the county court for the establishment-of a public drainage ditch or drain. Upon a trial of said proceedings in the county court there was a judgment adverse to the establishment of the ditch, and a like result followed a trial in the circuit conrt. Petitioners appealed to this court, and in an opinion reported in 179 Ky. 164, 200 S. W. 369, Carter, et al. v. Griffith, et al., the judgment of the lower conrt was- reversed because of erroneous instructions and the admission and rejection of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Williams v. WeddingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
- Katterhenry v. ArensmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1915
- Latham v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1916
- Carter v. GriffithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
- Hall v. PolkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Adams v. HornCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
- Kentucky & West Virginia Power Co. v. HowesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932