Legal Opinion

Katterhenry v. Arensman

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1915No. 22,391PublishedCited by 11 opinions

From Dubois Circuit Court; Oscar C. Minor, Special Judge. Drainage proceeding on the petition of Sarah Katterhenry and others, m which Henry Arensman and others filed remonstrances. From a judgment dismissing the proceeding, the petitioners appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtLairy, J.

— Appellants and other landowners filed a petition in the Dubois Circuit Court praying for the location, establishment and construction of a drain. Such proceedings were had as resulted in the appointment of viewers who reported in favor of the location and construction of the proposed ditch. The’system of drainage as reported by the commissioners was much more extensive than that described in the petition. A large area of the land Aas reported as affected and benefited and the owners of such lands were brought in by supplemental notices. After this report was filed, a large number of those…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Earhart v. Farmers' CreameryIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Hinshaw v. Security Trust Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1911

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Himelstein Bros., Inc. v. the Texas Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1955
  2. Lucksinger v. SalisburyWyoming Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Rockey v. HershmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Click v. ArnoldIndiana Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Bechtold v. WagnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API