Legal Opinion

Latham v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1916No. 18905PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from tbe district court for Frontier county: Leslie G. Hurd, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtFawcett, J.

Plaintiffs, who are owners of Swamp and overflowed lands traversed by Medicine creek, filed with the clerk of Ike district court for Frontier county articles of association for the organization of a drainage district. Rev. St. 1913, secs. 1797-1865. Summons was served upon the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company and upon Frontier county, the other owners of land within the proposed district. A number of owners of lands below the proposed drainage ditch intervened and challenged the right of plaintiffs to form the proposed district. After a hearing, the district court authorized the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Wickstrom v. Board of County Commissioners of Isanti CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  2. Zumbro v. ParninIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Kansas & C. P. R. Co. v. FitzgeraldNebraska Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kirchner v. GastNebraska Supreme Court · 1959
  2. State ex rel. Randall v. HallNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Drainage District No. 1 v. Kirkpatrick-Pettis Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Caldwell v. Guardian Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
  5. Cornhusker Electric Co. v. City of FairburyNebraska Supreme Court · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API