Legal Opinion

Continental Insurance v. Jachnichen

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1887No. 12,278PublishedCited by 33 opinions

From the Ripley Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

Jachnichen sued the Continental Insurance Company upon a policy of insurance, to recover the value of a barn and its contents, which the complaint alleged were covered by the policy, and which were alleged to have been destroyed by a fire, of unknown origin, in September, 1884.

Among other defences, the company answered that the assured had himself purposely burned the property witl^ the intent to defraud the insurance company.

The plaintiff below recovered. The only question presented by the record, which, in view of the defective condition of the bill of exceptions purporting to contain the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Elliott v. Van BurenMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Gebhart v. BurkettIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Blaeser v. Milwaukee Mechanics' Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Welch v. JugenheimerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881
  5. Bissell v. WertIndiana Supreme Court · 1871

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. ArmstrongIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Sundquist v. Hardware Mutual Fire Insurance Co. of MinnesotaIllinois Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Grant v. PendleyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  4. Modern Woodmen of America v. CraigerIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Edwards v. George Knapp & Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1888

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API