Legal Opinion

Edwards v. George Knapp & Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1888PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. Daniel Dillon, Judge. (lj The court, by plaintiff’s instructions numbered four and five, instructed the jury that to support the plea of justification of the charge, that the plaintiff did have carnal intercourse with her brother, the same proof must be adduced as would be necessary to convict the plaintiff upon an indictment for the crime of incest, and if the jury entertained a reasonable doubt of the plaintiff’s guilt of…

Read the full summary

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. Daniel Dillon, Judge. (lj The court, by plaintiff’s instructions numbered four and five, instructed the jury that to support the plea of justification of the charge, that the plaintiff did have carnal intercourse with her brother, the same proof must be adduced as would be necessary to convict the plaintiff upon an indictment for the crime of incest, and if the jury entertained a reasonable doubt of the plaintiff’s guilt of the crime charged against her, they should find a verdict for the plaintiffs. This was error. Bailey v. Norton, 65 Iowa,…

1Opinion of the CourtNorton, C. J.

This is an action for libel in which plaintiffs obtained judgment for five thousand dollars, from which defendant has appealed, and as one of the points relied upon to sustain the appeal arises on the pleadings it is necessary to insert so much of them as bears up©n the point raised, and hereinafter adverted to. Plaintiffs charge in their petition that on the eighteenth day of January, 1885, defendant maliciously published of and concerning the female plaintiff the false and defamatory words and libel as follows:

*434“ Cause oe a Double Murder.
“ Special to the Republican.
“St. Joseph, Mo., January…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Peoples v. Evening News Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Continental Insurance v. JachnichenIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Bradish v. BlissSupreme Court of Vermont · 1862
  4. Marshall v. Thames Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869
  5. Forshee v. AbramsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1856

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Abraham v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Florida · 1906
  2. Hearne v. De YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. State ex rel. Detroit Fire & Marine Insurance v. EllisonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1916
  4. Smith v. BurrusSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  5. Sundquist v. Hardware Mutual Fire Insurance Co. of MinnesotaIllinois Supreme Court · 1939

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API