Legal Opinion

Stolman v. Boston Furniture Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 12, 1935PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.

An involuntary petition in bankruptcy was filed against Frank J. Resnikoff, to whom reference is hereinafter made as Resnikoff, who was engaged in the furniture business. A settlement of his debts was effected with his creditors by a composition of 22% per cent., of which 15 per cent, was payable in cash and 7% per cent, in notes. The necessary cash was loaned to Resnikoff by Benjamin Stolman and Isadore Opper under a written agreement, by the terms of which Resnikoff was to secure them for such loans. It was agreed that he would cause to be organized a corporation named The Boston Furniture…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Barber v. International Co. of MexicoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1901
  2. Denunzio v. DenunzioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
  3. Low v. R. P. K. Pressed Metal Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
  4. Beach v. Beach Hotel CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  5. In re LewisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Howarth v. NorthcottSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
  2. Standard Land Corporation of Indiana v. BogardusIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Campisano v. NardiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  4. Hedworth v. ChapmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1963
  5. Martin v. Martin's News Service, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API