Jervis B. Webb Co. v. Southern Systems, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DeMASCIO, District Judge.
The defendant filed this motion to dismiss plaintiff’s patent infringement action for improper venue. Defendant argues that in a patent infringement action, 28 U.S.C. § 1400(b) is the exclusive venue provision and that section allows plaintiff to bring suit only in the district where defendant resides or where defendant has a regular and established place of business and has committed acts of infringement. We agreed with defendant and entered an order finding that defendant, a Tennessee corporation, does not reside in this district, Dual Mfg. &…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dawson Chemical Co. v. Rohm & Haas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Dual Manufacturing and Engineering, Inc. And the Berkline Corporation v. Burris Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
- Clyde M. Noll and S. Joseph Fortunato, as Trustees v. The O. M. Scott & Sons CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
- Richard E. Self v. Fisher Controls Company, Inc., and Control Specialists, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
3Cited by6 opinions
- New Hampshire Insurance v. R.L. Chaides Construction Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1994
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Star Technologies, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 1996
- Filenet Corp. v. Chubb Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
- Picker International, Inc. v. Varian Associates, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1987
- MAGICorp. v. Kinetic Presentations, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.