Legal Opinion
MAGICorp. v. Kinetic Presentations, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided May 10, 1989No. Civ. A. 88-2582PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HAROLD A. ACKERMAN, District Judge.
On June 14, 1988, MAGICorp brought this action alleging that Kinetic Presentations, Inc. (“Kinetic” or “KPI”) infringed MAGICorp’s United States Patent No. 4,181,955, and seeking permanent injunc-tive relief, compensatory and treble damages, and attorney’s fees. On July 11, 1988, Kinetic moved to dismiss the action for improper venue under 28 U.S.C. § 1400(b) or, in the alternative, to transfer the action to a district where there was proper venue. I referred this motion to United States Magistrate Stanley R. Chester for his report and recommendation…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Fourco Glass Co. v. Transmirra Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Panduit Corp. v. All States Plastic Manufacturing Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Deepsouth Packing Co. v. Laitram Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Howard A. Fromson v. Advance Offset Plate, Inc., Graphcoat, Inc., News Publishing Company of Framingham, Newspapers of New England, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. SUPERIOR COURT OF ORANGE CTY.California Court of Appeal · 1993
- State Farm Indemnity v. FornaroDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2002
- HomeBingo Network, Inc. v. ChayevskyDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2006
- EI DuPont De Nemours and Co. v. Monsanto Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1995