Legal Opinion

Minthorne v. Seeburg Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 2, 1968No. 21639_1Published

1Opinion of the Court

397 F.2d 237

Jean J. MINTHORNE and Melanie Minthorne, husband and wife, Appellants and Cross-Appellees,

v.

The SEEBURG CORPORATION, a corporation; Seeburg Distributing Company, a corporation, Appellees and Cross-Appellants.

No. 21639.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

June 21, 1968.

Rehearing Denied August 2, 1968.

Coit I. Hughes (argued), Harry A. Stewart, Jr., of Hughes & Hughes, Phoenix, Ariz., for appellants.

John P. Frank (argued), of Lewis, Roca, Beauchamp & Linton, Phoenix, Ariz., John L. Cole, of Loeb & Loeb, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellees.

Before POPE, MERRILL and CARTER, Circuit…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Southern Pac. Co. v. GuthrieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
  3. Siebrand v. GossnellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
  4. Gordon Mailloux Enterprises, Inc., and Merchants Wholesale Co., Inc. v. Firemen's Insurance Company of Newark, New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
  5. Verdier v. VerdierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API