Legal Opinion

In Re Water Use Permit Applications

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 2004No. 24873PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

NAKAYAMA, J.

Appellant Hakipu'u ‘Ohana and Ka Láhui Hawai'i [hereinafter, collectively, the “Windward Parties”]1 and appellant Hawaii’s Thousand Friends (HTF) appeal the Commission on Water Resource Management’s [hereinafter, the “Water Commission”] legal framework, findings of fact, and decision and order [hereinafter, the “D & O II”], filed on December 28, 2001, that disposed of seven issues this court remanded in In re Use Permit Applications (Waiāhole I), 94 Hawai'i 97, 9 P.3d 409 (2000). On appeal, the appellants argue that the Water Commission erred by: (1) setting…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Amfac, Inc. v. Waikiki Beachcomber Investment Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1992
  2. In Re Water Use Permit ApplicationsHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Coon v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. EastmanHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Public Access Shoreline Hawaii ex rel. Rothstein v. Hawai'i County Planning Commission ex rel. FujimotoHawaii Supreme Court · 1995

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Sierra Club v. Department of TransportationHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Kapuwai v. City & County of Honolulu, Department of Parks & RecreationHawaii Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Kauai Springs, Inc. v. Planning Commission of the County of Kauai.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2014
  4. In re 'Īao Ground Water Management Area High-Level Source Water Use Permit ApplicationsHawaii Supreme Court · 2012
  5. In Re Kukui (Molokai), Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API