Legal Opinion

Cody v. Insurance Company of Oregon

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1969PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.

This is an action for damages because of the breach of a claimed contract of fire and extended coverage insurance. Defendant insurance company appealed from.- a judgment in favor of plaintiff, who was' the person claimed to have been insured.

After verdict and judgment for plaintiff, he is entitled to the most favorable statement of facts that is justified by the evidence. The following is such a statement. Plaintiff was the owner of airport facilities. About October 1, 19G2, plaintiff leased the facilities to one Mitzel, with whom he agreed that the facilities would be insured by Mitzel in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cleveland Oil Co. v. Norwich Ins. SocietyOregon Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Reed v. Commercial InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Gilbert v. Globe & Rutgers Fire Ins.Oregon Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Rodgers Insurance Agency v. Andersen MacHineryOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Cerino v. Oregon Physicians' ServiceOregon Supreme Court · 1954

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Stinemeyer v. Wesco Farms, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Farley v. UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Carothers v. CarothersOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Hayes Truck Lines v. Investors Insurance Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Hill v. OlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API