Legal Opinion
Musial v. Yatzik
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided January 8, 1951No. Docket No., 17, Calendar 44,875PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.
During the early part of 1943, Casimir P. Musial, about to be drafted into the army, was allowed 90 days to straighten out his affairs. He sold his grocery and decided to use the proceeds to buy a house so that his wife Helen would have a place to live while he was away. The plan was discussed with Andrew and Elizabeth Yatzik, Helen Musial’s parents, and it was agreed that they would' live with Helen while Casimir was in the army. The 2 families found a satisfactory 2-story house, and they jointly signed the offei to purchase it. However, in their negotiations with the vendor, trouble…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Foreman v. ForemanNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Hackley v. HeadleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- Stephenson v. GoldenMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
- McIntyre v. McIntyreMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
- In Re Peck's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Grand Rapids Growers, Inc. v. Old Kent Bank & Trust Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1980
- Hartman v. Frontier City, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1969
- WHW Enterprises, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- Whw Enterprises, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Radio Portage, Inc., Portage, Michigan, Intervenor. The Air-Borne Group, Ltd. v. Federal Communications Commission, Radio Portage, Inc., Portage, Michigan, Intervenor. James R. Searer, James M. Searer and Susan L. Homan D/B/A Sear Broadcasting Company v. Federal Communications Commission, Radio Portage, Inc., Portage, Michigan, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- Finn v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.