Legal Opinion

McIntyre v. McIntyre

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1919No. Docket No. 72PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Berrien; North, J., presiding. Bill by John McIntyre against Catherine McIntyre for' a reconveyance of certain real estate. From a decree dismissing the bill, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBird, C. J.

The bill in this case is filed by plaintiff to compel defendant to reconvey certain premises situate in Benton Harbor, which he conveyed to her in the year 1896. The reasons which he gives are:(1) That the deed was without consideration.

*497(2) That defendant promised to reconvey wheii requested.(3) That the deed was obtained by fraud.(4) That he was mentally incompetent at the time.

The parties are brother and sister and neither were ever married. For several years after the father died, in 1874, they lived with their mother and two younger children. They all worked together, engaging in various…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Seamster v. BlackstockSupreme Court of Virginia · 1887
  2. Lang's Heirs v. WaringSupreme Court of Alabama · 1854
  3. Wipfler v. WipflerMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Newberry v. RuffinSupreme Court of Virginia · 1903
  5. Taylor v. SlaterSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1898

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Stephenson v. GoldenMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Garrett v. WashingtonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Harris v. Castile Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Vanderbush Sheet Metal Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1981
  5. Varanelli v. LuddySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API