Legal Opinion

WHW Enterprises, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided February 5, 1985No. Nos. 83-2067, 83-2071 and 83-2072PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge HARRY T. EDWARDS.

HARRY T. EDWARDS, Circuit Judge:

In this case, we review a decision of the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC” or “Commission”) granting Radio Portage, Inc. (“RPI”) authority to construct an FM broadcast facility in Portage, Michigan. In September 1975, the FCC allocated channel 299, a class B FM broadcast facility, to Kalamazoo, Michigan.1 Four applicants competed before the Commission for this channel — RPI, WHW Enterprises, Inc. (“WHW”), the Air-Borne Group, Ltd. (“Air-Borne”), and Sear Broadcasting Company (“Sear”). Of the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Federal Communications Commission v. Woko, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Penasquitos Village, Inc., Penasquitos Gardens, Inc., Penasquitos Hills, Inc., and San Diego Leisure Life Village v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  3. Federal Communications Commission v. Allentown Broadcasting Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. Interboro Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  5. Stephenson v. GoldenMichigan Supreme Court · 1937

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Whw Enterprises, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Radio Portage, Inc., Portage, Michigan, Intervenor. The Air-Borne Group, Ltd. v. Federal Communications Commission, Radio Portage, Inc., Portage, Michigan, Intervenor. James R. Searer, James M. Searer and Susan L. Homan D/B/A Sear Broadcasting Company v. Federal Communications Commission, Radio Portage, Inc., Portage, Michigan, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API