Legal Opinion

United States v. Morrow

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 9, 2005No. CRIM.A. 04-355CKKPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.

Currently before the Court are several filings by the parties that relate to the Government’s planned use of certain Deox-yriboNucleic Acid (“DNA”) evidence in the trial. Specifically, the Court is confronted with: (1) Defendants’ Joint Objections to the Government’s Proposed DNA Evidence, filed on April 5, 2005; (2) Government’s Opposition to Defendants’ Joint Objection to the Government’s Proposed DNA Evidence, filed on April 8, 2005; (3) Government’s Supplemental Opposition to Defendants’ Joint Objection to the Government’s Proposed DNA…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. In Re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  4. United States v. John Ray Bonds (91-3610) Mark Verdi (91-3609) and Steven Wayne Yee (91-3608)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  5. Richard Leander Ferebee, Jr. v. Chevron Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Young v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. State v. LangillSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
  3. In re Abilify (Aripiprazole) Prods. Liab. Litig.District Court, N.D. Florida · 2018
  4. United States v. McCluskeyDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2013
  5. United States v. Orleans-LindsayDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API