Legal Opinion

Pullman Company v. Hoyle

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 9, 1908PublishedCited by 31 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Bobertson County. Tried below before Hon. J. C. Scott.

1Opinion of the Court

RICE, Associate Justice.

— This suit was instituted by S. C. Hoyle, one of the appellees, against the Pullman Company and also against the International & Great Horthern Bailroad Company, for the recovery of damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by his wife, Mrs. Mabel'A. Hoyle, resulting from having been wrongfully caused to debark from a Pullman sleeper, before the arrival of the train at the station of Hearne, which was her destination, she being a passenger thereon.

It was substantially alleged that about October 19, 1903, Mrs. Mabel A. Hoyle, wife of plaintiff,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. City of San Antonio v. Smith & Hildebrand & HamiltonTexas Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Payne v. BenhamTexas Supreme Court · 1856
  3. Pullman Palace Car Co. v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  4. East Tenn., Va. & Ga. Railroad v. LockhartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
  5. Trawick v. Martin Brown Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1889

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Vann v. National Life & Accident Ins. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1930
  2. Colorado & Southern Railway Co. v. Western Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1923
  3. Barton v. Farmers' State BankTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  4. City of Dallas v. McElroyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  5. Atwood v. AtwoodSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1911

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API