Legal Opinion

Pullman Palace Car Co. v. Smith

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1890No. 3211PublishedCited by 33 opinions

Error from Kaufman. Tried below before Hon. Anson Bainey.

1Opinion of the Court

HENRY, Associate Justice.

This suit was brought by the appellee against the Pullman Palace Car Company, a corporation, to recover damages.

The petition alleges that plaintiff and his wife engaged passage on a train of the Texas & Pacific Railway Company to Terrell, in this State. That being such passengers, they at a point in the State of Louisiana applied to the defendant corporation for and obtained from it berths on the Pullman sleeping car which was run in connection with the train on said railway. That shortly after entering said sleeping car plaintiff and his wife retired and were asleep.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pullman Palace Car Co. v. PollockTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Pullman Palace Car Co. v. Matthews.Texas Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Moore v. Atlanta Transit System, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  2. Pullman Company v. HoyleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
  3. Traders & General Ins. Co. v. BurnsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  4. Armour & Co. v. TomlinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  5. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API