Legal Opinion

Discover Bank v. Bennington

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 13, 2018No. 2017-G-0138PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtColleen Mary O'Toole, J.

{¶ 1} Appellant, Joy L. Bennington, appeals from the October 13, 2017 judgment of the Chardon Municipal Court, denying her motion to stay proceedings pending *285 arbitration. The main issue presented in this appeal is whether a defendant may obtain a stay of proceedings pending arbitration without having first initiated the arbitration proceedings. For the reasons stated, we reverse and remand.

{¶ 2} On February 10, 2017, appellee, Discover Bank ("Discover"), filed a complaint against appellant to recover an unpaid credit card balance alleging the following: Discover is a foreign corporation…

Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. ABM Farms, Inc. v. WoodsOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Kelm v. KelmOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Naylor Family Partnership v. Home S. & L. Co. of YoungstownOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Capital One Bank (USA) N.A. v. RotmanOhio Court of Appeals · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Paradie v. Turning Point Builders, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021
  2. Johnson v. Encino Energy, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2025
  3. Buckeye Boy Scout Found. v. Encino Energy, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API