Discover Bank v. Bennington
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtColleen Mary O'Toole, J.
{¶ 1} Appellant, Joy L. Bennington, appeals from the October 13, 2017 judgment of the Chardon Municipal Court, denying her motion to stay proceedings pending *285 arbitration. The main issue presented in this appeal is whether a defendant may obtain a stay of proceedings pending arbitration without having first initiated the arbitration proceedings. For the reasons stated, we reverse and remand.
{¶ 2} On February 10, 2017, appellee, Discover Bank ("Discover"), filed a complaint against appellant to recover an unpaid credit card balance alleging the following: Discover is a foreign corporation…
Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- ABM Farms, Inc. v. WoodsOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Kelm v. KelmOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- Naylor Family Partnership v. Home S. & L. Co. of YoungstownOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- Capital One Bank (USA) N.A. v. RotmanOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Paradie v. Turning Point Builders, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021
- Johnson v. Encino Energy, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2025
- Buckeye Boy Scout Found. v. Encino Energy, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2025