Action Apartment Assn. v. City of Santa Monica
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TURNER, P. J.
I. INTRODUCTION
This is principally a takings case. In Dolan v. City of Tigard (1994) 512 U.S. 374, 386-391 [129 L.Ed.2d 304, 114 S.Ct. 2309] and Nollan v. California Coastal Comm’n (1987) 483 U.S. 825, 836-837 [97 L.Ed.2d 677, 107 S.Ct. 3141], the United States Supreme Court adopted what is called a “nexus” and “rough proportionality” test to be applied in an “exaction” case; i.e. when a public entity conditions approval of a proposed development on the dedication of property to public use. (See Monterey v. Del Monte Dunes at Monterey, Ltd. (1999) 526 U.S. 687, 702 [143…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- R. A. v. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Shaw v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- California Building Industry Ass'n v. City of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- Building Industry Ass'n v. County of StanislausCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Beach & Bluff Conservancy v. City of Solana Beach, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Building Industry Assn. of Central California v. City of PattersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.