Legal Opinion

Action Apartment Assn. v. City of Santa Monica

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 28, 2008No. B201176PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TURNER, P. J.

I. INTRODUCTION

This is principally a takings case. In Dolan v. City of Tigard (1994) 512 U.S. 374, 386-391 [129 L.Ed.2d 304, 114 S.Ct. 2309] and Nollan v. California Coastal Comm’n (1987) 483 U.S. 825, 836-837 [97 L.Ed.2d 677, 107 S.Ct. 3141], the United States Supreme Court adopted what is called a “nexus” and “rough proportionality” test to be applied in an “exaction” case; i.e. when a public entity conditions approval of a proposed development on the dedication of property to public use. (See Monterey v. Del Monte Dunes at Monterey, Ltd. (1999) 526 U.S. 687, 702 [143…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. R. A. v. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Shaw v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. California Building Industry Ass'n v. City of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Building Industry Ass'n v. County of StanislausCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. Beach & Bluff Conservancy v. City of Solana Beach, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  5. Building Industry Assn. of Central California v. City of PattersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API