Froke v. Watertown Gas Co.
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.
Plaintiff brought this .action against the defendant for damages alleged to have been suffered as the result of an explosion of illuminating gas in a dwelling house. Defendant made a motion for a directed verdict at the conclusion of plaintiff’s testimony and again at the conclusion of all of the testimony on thé ground of insufficiency of the evidence, which motions were denied, and after verdict for plaintiff was rendered, defendant made a motion non obstante, which was denied, and judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiff. The judgment on appeal to this court was reversed. Froke v.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cruikshank v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
- Marquardt v. HubnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
- Kerr v. StauferSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
- Murphy v. Sioux Falls Serum Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1923
- Schnepper v. WhitingSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1904
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Weeks v. Prostrollo Sons, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. PercySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
- Williams v. Wessington Twp.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1944
- General Tire & Rubber Co. v. HammSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
- Profit Counselors, Inc. v. KnightSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.