Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Dombrauskas

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 18, 1980No. 2211PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

Appellant, Richard F. Dombrauskas, was tried by a jury on counts of robbery, theft, simple assault, recklessly endangering another person and possession of an instrument of crime. He was found guilty of theft and acquitted of all other charges. Following the denial of post-trial motions, appellant was placed on probation for a period of twenty-three months and directed to pay $250.00 in lieu of fine. On appeal, he alleges six trial errors. None of these have merit, and, therefore, we affirm.

Mark Kozak, Michael Donohue, Timothy Rudolph and appellant were engaged in a “friendly”…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BighumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Commonwealth v. GoosbySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Commonwealth v. RootsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Commonwealth v. EnglandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Commonwealth v. QuarantaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. People v. BarnettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. People v. BarnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. People v. TufungaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Commonwealth v. NamackSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Commonwealth v. StinnettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API