Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Smith

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 8, 1988No. 02439PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

This appeal is from the judgment of sentence for murder in the first degree and possession of an instrument of crime. Appellant contends that the trial court erred in refusing to permit trial counsel to file supplemental reasons in support of post-trial motions. In addition, appellant raises nine claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the judgment of sentence. 1

On January 20, 1985, appellant was arrested and charged in connection with the November 20, 1980 shooting death of Rodney Smith. On December 3,1986, following a jury…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Commonwealth v. PettusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Commonwealth v. AllenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BazemoreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Commonwealth v. KarenbauerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Commonwealth v. GranberrySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Commonwealth v. BlackwellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Commonwealth v. ThomasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API