Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Styblo v. McNeil

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 6, 1943No. Gen. No. 42,186PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Burke

delivered the opinion of the court.

Rudolph Styblo and Louise Styblo, husband and wife, filed their amended two count statement of claim in the municipal court of Chicago against James H. McNeil to recover damages for personal injuries suffered by Louise and for damages to an automobile owned by Rudolph, incurred in a collision between the Styblo automobile and a police car of the City of Chicago being driven by defendant on August 19,1939. Count 1 alleged negligence and count 2 wilful, wanton and reckless conduct by the defendant in the operation of the police car.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Provenzano v. I. C. R. R. Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Taylor v. City of BerwynIllinois Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Bryan v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1939
  4. People ex rel. McClintock v. SkinnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1851
  5. G. B. Hemmingway Co. v. KeagleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Johnson v. JacksonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1963
  2. Fullerton v. RobsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  3. Dear v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  4. Ras v. Allan Anthony Electric Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1965
  5. LaCerra v. WoodrichAppellate Court of Illinois · 1943

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API