Legal Opinion

People ex rel. McClintock v. Skinner

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1851PublishedCited by 5 opinions

This was an application to this court for a peremptory mandamus, upon the facts set out in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtTreat, C. J.

McClintock sued Smith before a justice of the peace, and recovered a judgment for $62.52. On appeal, the jury returned a verdict in favor of McClintock, for $130.62. On the coming in of the verdict, he entered a remittitur for $30.62. Smith made a motion in arrest of judgment, which was overruled ; and the court, on its own motion, set aside the verdict, and continued the case. McClintock then entered a motion for a judgment for $100 and costs, which was denied. He has sued out a mandamus from this court, for the purpose of compelling the circuit judge to enter a judgment on the verdict for…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Downing v. FlorerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1878
  2. Styblo v. McNeilAppellate Court of Illinois · 1943
  3. Binger v. BakerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1945
  4. G. B. Hemmingway Co. v. KeagleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1913
  5. Reading v. MeadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1885

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API