Legal Opinion

Fullerton v. Robson

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 19, 1978No. 76-318, 76-747 consPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lorenz

Defendants (Marquette) appeal from a judgment awarding plaintiffs (Fullerton) $51,366 in damages for breach of contract and denying their counterclaim. On appeal Marquette contends that (1) the trial court erred in admitting irrelevant and prejudicial evidence; (2) the trial court improperly excluded certain exhibits and testimony; and (3) the jury verdict is against the manifest weight of the evidence.

At trial the following pertinent evidence was adduced.

For the plaintiffs

Plaintiff Lee Fullerton on his own behalf

He is a coal broker or wholesaler who sells coal directly from the mines to coal…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. The People v. TrefonasIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Chicago City Railway Co. v. UhterIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Cole v. BrundageAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  4. Chicago Union Traction Co. v. LauthIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Forest Preserve District v. DraperIllinois Supreme Court · 1944

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. WardIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Zelinski v. Security Lumber Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  3. Congregation of the Passion, Holy Cross Province v. Touche Ross & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  4. Johnson v. Amerco, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  5. Stach v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API