Legal Opinion

New v. Consolidated Rock Products Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 26, 1985No. B001217PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FEINERMAN, P. J.

Plaintiffs, Richard New and Bruce A. Williams, were injured while riding their motorcycles on the property of defendant, Consolidated Rock Products. In a pretrial ruling, the superior court held that defendant was entitled to the protection of Civil Code section 846, which immunizes landholders from liability to nonpaying recreational users of their property, except where the landholder willfully or maliciously fails to warn or guard against a dangerous condition. By way of a special verdict, the jury found that defendant had acted willfully or in conscious disregard of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Neal v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. People v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Taylor v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Oettinger v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Ornelas v. RandolphCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Calvillo-Silva v. Home GroceryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Carlsen v. KoivumakiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. Paslay v. State Farm General Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. Charpentier v. Von GeldernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API