Legal Opinion

Ungerer & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided December 9, 1952No. C. D. 1483PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, Judge:

This action involves the amount of duty levied by the collector upon 12 cases of Patchouli oil; The plaintiff claims that the collector erroneously failed to make an allowance in duties for the goods missing in a case which was empty when delivered from the pier to the importer.

At the trial, the plaintiff submitted the case on the basis of the official papers transmitted by the collector of customs and the inspector’s report. The report of the inspector was marked in evidence as exhibit 1. The Government, however, objected to any papers in the record other than the inspector’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Borgfeldt & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923
  2. United States v. LippmannCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
  3. United States v. BrownCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  4. F. W. Woolworth Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1949
  5. Washington State Liquor Control Board v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Victor Importing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  2. Geo. S. Bush & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
  3. Pastene & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API